But never mind the first two " Spy Kids" were exuberant fun ("Spy Kids 3-D" sucked, in great part because of the 3-D). I held back, wondering if perhaps the Spy Kids would have been better served if the films had not been such a manic demonstration of his method. You want a nuclear submarine, you make one out of thin air and put your characters into it. You want a light over here, you grab a light and put it over here. This is the future! You don't wait six hours for a scene to be lighted. I remember him leaping out of his chair and bouncing around a hotel room, pantomiming himself filming "Spy Kids 2" with a digital camera and editing it on a computer. Rodriguez has been aiming toward "Sin City" for years. And there's a narration that plays like the captions at the top of the frame, setting the stage and expressing a stark existential world view. Some of the stills from the film look so much like frames of the comic book as to make no difference. On the movie's website, there's a slide show juxtaposing the original drawings of Frank Miller with the actors playing the characters, and then with the actors transported by effects into the visual world of graphic novels. We get not so much their presence as their essence the movie is not about what the characters say or what they do, but about who they are in our wildest dreams. The actors are mined for the archetypes they contain Bruce Willis, Mickey Rourke, Jessica Alba, Rosario Dawson, Benicio Del Toro, Clive Owen and the others are rotated into a hyperdimension. It internalizes the harsh world of the Frank Miller "Sin City" comic books and processes it through computer effects, grotesque makeup, lurid costumes and dialogue that chops at the language of noir. The movie is not about narrative but about style. It contains characters who occupy stories, but to describe the characters and summarize the stories would be like replacing the weather with a weather map. Overall please do not go by the critics review and watch and review the film by your own wisdom.This isn't an adaptation of a comic book, it's like a comic book brought to life and pumped with steroids. The climax of the film is predictable but still excites. Acting is great and despite of a huge star cast almost everyone had got ample screen-time and none of them has disappointed. The screenplay of the film is good, the film might gets slow in the middle but will not loose the grip from the viewers, the film is just like it's first part is all in all violent and is full of nudity. Two biggest drawback i felt that the film has is it's similar plot and almost similar execution, new characters were added in the film but still the film lacks originality and freshness. The film might not be as magnificent as it's first part but still can't be termed as an all-out disappointment. I am still not been able to understand the hate of critics for this film. The film stars ensemble cast of Mickey Rourke, Jessica Alba, Rosario Dawson, Jaime King, Late Powers Boothe, Bruce Willis, Josh Brolin, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Eva Green, Dennis Haysbert, Ray Liotta, Christopher Lloyd, Jamie Chung, Jeremy Piven, Christopher Meloni, Stacy Keach, Lady Gaga, Alexa Vega, Julia Garner, and Juno Temple. The film is Directed by Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller. Sin City: A Dame to Kill For a.k.a as Frank Miller's Sin City: A Dame to Kill For is an action crime film and follow-up to the 2005 film Sin City.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |